The term IQ stands for "Intelligence Quotient" which corresponds
initially to the ratio : "Mental Age" divided by "Age" times 100.
If a young boy of 10 years has an intellectual level equal to that of 12
years old, his IQ is 120 (12/10*100).
A young girl of 8 years with the same intellectual level as the young boy has an IQ of 150
(12/8*100).
The normal IQ is obviously 100. This method of calculus (ratio) is unacceptable with adults.
For them, IQ is not a ratio but a number indicating the way they distinguish themselves from the mean of the population.
For example, an engineer with an IQ of 130 is ranked #2 of a population of 100 (he reaches the top 2%).
The IQ obtained by a person at two different time periods (child then adult) remains almost the same even if the way of calculating differs.
Basically the ability to solve new problems.
It includes abstract thinking, analogical thinking, logic, rigor, analytic sense,
short-term memory, observation, spatial skills, computation skills,
creativity, insight, perseverance, speed of thinking, ...
We call intelligence the fluid intelligence which does not require
any prior knowledge or training.
An aptitude can be improved by specific learning.
Moreover, an aptitude level in a field may not reflect the general intelligence measured by IQ tests.
The repartition of IQ scores corresponds to a bell curve with the majority of the scores around 100 and a minority far from 100 (<70 or >130). See the figure 1 :

By definition, the average score is 100.
There are 68% of the population with an IQ between 85 and 115.
Persons with an IQ between 115 and 130 have a superior intelligence.
People with IQ above 130 have a very superior intelligence.
Statisticians quantify the scores with a number called "Standard Deviation" (SD).
In usual IQ tests, SD is 15 points, it means that a person with an IQ of 145 is located 3 SD far away from the mean.
Cattell tests use an SD of 24, hence IQ of 148 (+ 2 SD) in Cattell tests correspond to an IQ of 130 in Wechsler tests.
Standard deviation help label correctly the different ranges of scores.
My SD is 15 as in Wechsler scale.
IQ scores indicates how intelligent you are, i.e. in which range of the population you are located. The categories are written below.
| IQ | ||
|---|---|---|
| 175+ | Profoundly gifted | |
| 160 | Exceptionally gifted | 0.01 % |
| 145 | Highly gifted | 0.1 % |
| 130 | Very superior | 2.2 % |
| 120-129 | Superior | 6.7 % |
| 110-119 | High average | 16 % |
| 90-109 | Average | 50 % |
| 90- | Tired :-) | 25 % |
For children, the WISC (Weschler Intelligence Scale for Children) is used everywhere in the USA and in Europe.
For adults there are the WAIS (Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale) and the Stanford-Binet.
All these tests include many different tasks as Vocabulary, General knowledge, Memory, Arithmetic, Puzzles, Picture completion, ...
Short form and well-known IQ tests are these from Raven (Advanced Progressive Matrice), from Cattell (Culture-Fair and Culture free), and from Anstay (D48, D70, D2000).
All these tests are very acultural and measure g factor.
Remark : my intelligence tests are inspired by g factor tests.
For young adults without any problems with computers and colors :-)
Experiments tend to show a maximum level at about 16-22 years of age.
My tests are empirically standardized on adult population.
Measuring precisely the extreme level of intelligence is impossible...
My tests let you to localize your IQ in a range of 110-170+.
If you scored out of this range, your score is not reliable.
No calculator nor help ! Only your mind.
Plus or minus ten points (except if health problems, of course).
Yes. By repetitive training and with great motivation you can improve your IQ score by a maximum of 15%.
If you absolutely want to see the right answers, hack the javascript/php files :-)
Seriously, I think you had better to think and re-think the problems over !
Yes, I believe so.
But if you see a bad item with at least two good solutions, write me your observations in the address indicated on the main page.
| Test | Score | Ceiling | Top scorer |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quick | 136 | 140 | Michael Chew - Hong-Kong |
| 138 | 140 | Jessila - France | |
| 140 | 140 | David S. - Norway | |
| 140 | 140 | Dr. Mehmet H. - Austria | |
| 140+ | 140 | Tamas Kezer - Hungary | |
| Sequences | 138 | 150 | David S. - Norway |
| 144 | 150 | Matilda Rougieux - France | |
| 144 | 150 | Göran Åhlander - Sweden | |
| 150 | 150 | Bence Kun - Hungary | |
| 150 | 150 | Dr. Mehmet H. - Austria | |
| Dominoes | 136 | 170 | David S. - Norway |
| 140 | 170 | Michael Chew - Hong-Kong | |
| 146 | 170 | Brett Frederickson - USA | |
| 156 | 170 | Dr. Mehmet H. - Austria | |
| 156 | 170 | Juho Kärenlampi - Finland | |
| 170 | 170 | Omoyele Shodeinde - ? | |
| Matrix A | 138 | 150 | David S. - Norway |
| 150 | 150 | Juho Kärenlampi - Finland | |
| 150 | 150 | Dr. Jürgen Koller - Austria | |
| 150 | 150 | Brett Frederickson - USA | |
| Matrix B | 160 | 180 | Brendan Harris - Canada |
| Matrix C | 136 | 180 | Achilleas Kef - Greece |
| Arrow A | 144 | 160 | David S. - Norway |
| 156 | 160 | Jonathon Griffin - USA | |
| Arrow B | 130 | 170 | Michael Chew - Hong-Kong |
| 130 | 170 | Dr. Mehmet H. - Austria | |
| 148 | 170 | David S. - Norway | |
| 165 | 170 | Jonathon Griffin - USA | |
| Flip A | 167 | 180 | Jonathon Griffin - USA |
| Flip B | 156 | 170 | Jonathon Griffin - USA |
| Analytic | 136 | 170 | Achilleas Kef - Greece |
| 136 | 170 | Andrey Luiz Galeazzi - Brazil | |
| 164 | 170 | Juho Kärenlampi - Finland | |
| Pattern Recognition | 134 | 170 | Achilleas Kef - Greece |
| 145 | 170 | David S. - Norway | |
| 154 | 170 | Jonathon Griffin - USA | |
| Numeric | 156 | 180 | Jonathon Griffin - USA |
| 156 | 180 | Dr. Mehmet H. - Austria | |
| 164 | 180 | Brendan Harris - Canada | |
| Combinatorial | 20 | 20 | David S. - Norway |
| 20 (63 s) | 20 | Jonathon Griffin - USA | |
If you score better, write me an e-mail and I will control your score.
Yes if your web page does not contain any insanity :-)